Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s education reform agenda seemed invincible, until parents and activists started speaking out.
Opponents of the mayor’s plans garnered a victory Saturday afternoon after staging a sit-in at the Brian Piccolo Specialty School on Chicago’s West Side. The near 24-hour occupation by parents came to an end after reaching an agreement with a member of the Chicago Public Schools’ Board of Education. Parents and board members will meet on Monday to discuss the school’s future.
CPS plans on closing two schools and implementing a controversial program called “turn-around” at the Piccolo school along with nine others. The board plans to vote on these actions Wednesday. Parents believe the board came to the conclusion based upon wrong information.
“You cannot go around and effect the lives of thousands of children based on a lack of information,” said Cecile Carroll, a community member and parent of two Chicago Public Schools students, during a press conference announcing the end of the occupation. “If you would have engaged with us in the first place, we would never had to do this.”
Earlier on Friday they tried to meet with Mayor Emanuel at City Hall with no success. The fight to save the Piccolo school and others has been going on for months now. In December parents and activists mic-checked the board and demanded their voices be heard. Thus far the only thing heard is the direct action over this past weekend.
At the time I reported for Progress Illinois on the closings. Pablo Casals is one of the schools on the turn-around list as well.
“With limited resources [Pablo] Casals already outperforms citywide schools as well as six of 11 AUSL schools,” said Sharon Herod-Purham, a teacher at the elementary school slated to be turned around. Herod-Purham spoke of data showing her school’s improvement running higher than some of the AUSL schools and claimed turnaround would not help the children. “In fact AUSL schools need a lifeline themselves. Yet, AUSL will receive millions of dollars from CPS to turn Casals around. But Casals has 300 applications for after school programs, yet receives just 47 seats. That’s only 16 percent of the applicants. I wonder what Casals could do at its present capacity with a quarter of the money allocated for that AUSL program.”
Occupy Chicago notes, “Piccolo has failed because CPS has refused to invest in public education.” Occupy Chicago claims CPS is in violation of both the Illinois School Code and the Illinois Civil Rights Act because they did not lay out an action plan with the local school councils or properly fund the achievement gap programs required.
Instead of trying to properly fund schools the board seems intent on firing entire staffs and turning them over to Academy for Urban School Leadership. The former chair of the so-called non-profit, David Vitale, now chairs CPS’s board. The current COO of CPS once handled the finances at AUSL.
This is nothing more than a shell game. Well connected people with money (Vitale was once president of the Chicago Board of Trade, Penny Pritzker with a net worth of $1.7 billion serves on the board, and the mayor who is funded by the same) decide what happens to public school children when their children never went to one. The staff fired would deplete union membership and the replacements would be without the benefits of the teachers union.
As Jeff Bryant notese at OurFuture, the reform language is a ruse.
Arrayed under the reformist banner is an agreed-upon policy agenda that tends to include expanding charter schools, evaluating schools and teachers based on high-stakes test scores, standardizing curriculum, recruiting nontraditional teachers, and sanctioning and closing schools that don’t meet specific performance benchmarks. But what’s immediately puzzling about this self-proclaimed “reform” movement is that the policies it seeks to enforce have been, since the last time Federal education policy was revised, the law of the land. And they have been for the past ten years since the passage of that legislation, known as No Child Left Behind.
Disturbing. The mayor’s intention seems to be a complete restructure of Chicago public schools. Glad parents are fighting back but this type of attack is going to take a lot more than a sit-in at one school.
CREDO Mobile’s Super PAC will set its sights on ten tea party Congressman this November according to a press release. Illinois’ own self-proclaimed “crazy Tea Party freshman,” Joe Walsh heads the list of the six named so far by the group.
Walsh faces a tough reelection fight in the redrawn 8th Congressional District that spans from O’Hare to Elgin. His Democratic opponent is not yet known as two heavyweights, Tammy Duckworth and Raja Krishnamoorthi, fight it out until the March 20 primary.
CREDO aims to support local organizing in all ten targeted districts through a volunteer based grassroots initiative. The newly formed SuperPAC claims to have the second most donors, trailing only satirist Stephen Colbert’s foray into politics, and will spend millions of dollars around the nation.
“We’re talking about some of the most odious members of Congress. Even for Republicans these guys are low,” said Campaign Manager Matthew “Mudcat” Arnold in a statement. “We’re going to empower local activists to organize their friends and neighbors to lay out the truth about their representatives in the most basic terms: They are anti-woman. They are anti-science. They are hypocritical, bigoted, and have said and done things that are downright crazy. They’ve done more to embarrass their constituents then they have to govern or work toward solutions. They are unfit for Congress, and we’re going to help their constituents hold them accountable.”
CREDO cites Walsh’s controversial statements as further reasoning to campaign against him, including his infamous rant about blaming banks for the economic collapse where he said, “Don’t blame the banks! And don’t blame the marketplace for the mess we’re in right now! I’m tired of hearing this crap! This pisses me off!”
Multiple news agencies report the Congressman owes more than $100,000 in back child support. He denies the figure and claims they are working it out.
Unlike other SuperPACs that air an onslaught of commercials near election day, CREDO plans to open offices in each district, conduct a field operation, hire staff, and led local activists against Walsh. Offices are expected to open up in March.
“Where Karl Rove and the Koch brothers can use shady money from a few hidden donors to fund a barrage of TV attack ads, this SuperPAC will empower local voters and our list of 2.5 million activists to build a grassroots campaign that is as hard hitting as it is progressive,” said Becky Bond, president of the CREDO SuperPAC. Using innovative tactics, technology, and good, old fashioned grassroots organizing, we’re going to kick Tea Party Republican Joe Walsh out of office.”
By law SuperPACs and candidate campaigns cannot coordinate efforts. As such, CREDO will try to drive up activist anger against Walsh and drive them to the polling places in November. Regardless, on the ground involvement is good news for the Democratic nominee. Following Tammy Duckworth’s 2006 primary victory, local activists who supported Christine Cegelis were hard pressed to vote for the nominee in the general. CREDO’s efforts could dampen any potential ill will between the two current candidates.
“Congressman Joe Walsh refuses to make commonsense compromises on issues that would be good for the nation as a whole due to their ideological extremism,” said Raja Krishnamoorthi, Democratic candidate in the 8th district. “As a result, Tea Party Republican Joe Walsh has been detrimental to the middle class and our economic recovery, so I certainly understand the desire to beat them at the ballot box, and that is what I aim to do.”
Tammy Duckworth’s campaign declined comment and Joe Walsh’s office did not return a call.
CREDO will also go after Rep. Frank Guinta (R-NH), Rep. Chip Cravaack (R-MN), Rep. Sean Duffy (R-WI), Rep. Allen West (R-FL), and Rep. Steve King (R-IA). The remaining four spots will be determined with input from CREDO members and subscribers.
Enjoy this takedown by Jon Stewart. More stuff will be up later today. The morning is not going quite as planned.
In a letter to Apple employees about the company’s supply chain, CEO Tim Cook opened up by saying:
As a company and as individuals, we are defined by our values. Unfortunately some people are questioning Apple’s values today, and I’d like to address this with you directly. We care about every worker in our worldwide supply chain. Any accident is deeply troubling, and any issue with working conditions is cause for concern. Any suggestion that we don’t care is patently false and offensive to us. As you know better than anyone, accusations like these are contrary to our values. It’s not who we are. For the many hundreds of you who are based at our suppliers’ manufacturing sites around the world, or spend long stretches working there away from your families, I know you are as outraged by this as I am. For the people who aren’t as close to the supply chain, you have a right to know the facts.
Unfortunately, the contract workers at Foxconn do not count as Apple employees and did not receive the email (if they even have access). I doubt the concerns raised in newspapers and blogs would be offensive. I would hope they would find it to be a voice for them as well as a call on big corporations to take into account the horrific working conditions.
If Apple cares about the people in their supply chain then there are things they can do about it. This is not to say consumers, like myself, bear no responsibility. Buyers of the iPhone or other tech products know where these things come from. I know my Apple products are manufactured in China and without doing some research knew they labored under inhumane conditions.
Sadly, consumers lack choices in purchasing fair trade products. The markets has yet to come around to this because they cost a little more and the economy crushed many of our pocketbooks.
Regardless, Apple, other tech companies, as well as other producers, can take steps to curb these human rights abuses. Mike Elgan at Culture of Mac simplified a few of the options:
1. Move manufacturing out of China.
2. Take a hands-off approach to worker welfare.
3. Aggressively chip away at the problems associated with contract manufacturing with a program of iterative improvement, higher standards, constant audits and growing transparency.
4. Initiate an aggressive program of paying component suppliers and contract manufacturers more in exchange for transparency, worker welfare and environmental safeguards.
One and two do not really work in the short-term nor the long-term. The second option would only further the problem currently facing Apple’s image and the world-wide practice we see at Foxconn. The first could be a winner for workers in the United States but the transition process would be costly and take years.
Elgan says Apple is currently doing number three but should also aggressively implement the fourth option. It would act as an incentive program for contracted factories and suppliers to do the right thing. Monetary incentives can work, but only if they come with oversight. Who is to say they will claim the better practices while pocketing the incentives?
So it comes down to oversight. This is where a fifth option exists.
If we made trade fair other countries would need to implement regulations on workers rights, environment, and more. Having these laws on the books provide must follow guidelines for companies. Workers would be guaranteed a certain wage, sustainable work hours, and proper protections against harmful chemicals.
But that is too logical. It takes into account fellow human beings while the bottom line for corporations is to make money for their shareholders. Countering this culture takes time and activism. The 99 percent movement highlights many of these problems and has pushed income inequality into the news cycle. The pressure need to continue on corporations and on elected officials.
But Apple has piled up billions of dollars on the backs of people that threaten to kill themselves over the torturous work.
Satire getting to the heart of the problem.